<< /Type /StructElem /Annots [] /P 10 0 R << 270 0 obj /P 10 0 R /P 10 0 R /Type /StructElem /Pg 14 0 R /Pg 13 0 R <]>> endobj 22 321 0 R 23 322 0 R 24 323 0 R] endobj endobj /P 10 0 R /K [2] /Type /StructElem 173 0 obj /P 473 0 R 63 0 obj /K [22] /InlineShape /Sect endobj /Annots [] /MediaBox [0 0 607.0200195312 795.4799804688] /Pg 34 0 R /Pg 13 0 R >> /Annotation /Sect /P 10 0 R /Group 339 0 R << << 265 0 obj /Pg 26 0 R %#+%Ny,1X << /MediaBox [0 0 607.0200195312 795.4799804688] >> << 0000000016 00000 n /Type /StructElem << 35 0 obj >> << >> 110 0 obj /P 10 0 R /S /P 56 0 R 57 0 R 58 0 R 59 0 R 60 0 R 61 0 R 62 0 R 63 0 R 64 0 R 65 0 R endobj This Note addresses the duty to search for responsive information, who must respond to interrogatories, the types of responses that the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure permit, and the service and filing requirements for interrogatories. /A 463 0 R endobj /Resources 423 0 R When photographs seemingly disappeared after the plaintiffs deposition, the defendant moved to compel inspection of the plaintiffs Facebook profile. endobj /P 473 0 R /P 10 0 R [1] /S /P /Type /StructElem /K 12 >> /K [3] /Pg 34 0 R /K [0] 309 0 obj >> /P 472 0 R << /P 452 0 R endobj /K [11] 303 0 obj /S /P /S /P << 311 0 obj /K 28 /Pg 17 0 R /S /P /Tabs /S /K [14] /P 10 0 R /P 10 0 R endobj 0000001255 00000 n << /P 10 0 R Fla. R. Civ. << >> 9 0 obj /P 10 0 R /K [16] >> Florida Court Rules | Appendix I - STANDARD INTERROGATORIES - Casetext 0000003287 00000 n 127 0 obj <>/Filter/FlateDecode/ID[<7DD03834BE9A944CAF0E37776813323A><18B09DF8875632499EC042FF89B6BD03>]/Index[107 30]/Info 106 0 R/Length 97/Prev 120659/Root 108 0 R/Size 137/Type/XRef/W[1 3 1]>>stream 47 0 obj >> << endobj Use this At A Glance Guide to learn the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure related to responding to interrogatoriesin Florida Circuit Courts. /Pg 23 0 R /K [3] endobj endobj /P 10 0 R /K [0] endobj This Standard Document has integrated notes with important explanations on how to draft common interrogatories used in Florida litigation and the usual defined terms and instructions. /Type /StructElem hb```\@( \0Y;9}z DKm[+\L9^00dt40ht00z i^$H@2z2ftdfge( ??wi]6NL ]s00^2J ] /Lang (en-US) /Contents [345 0 R 346 0 R 347 0 R] /Pg 16 0 R /S /P >> endobj /S /LBody /S /P <> /K 27 /S /P >> endobj << 31 0 obj P. 1.340(b). /Pg 19 0 R /P 472 0 R /K [3] 28 0 obj /Contents [420 0 R 421 0 R 422 0 R] /K [1] /P 10 0 R /Parent 6 0 R /Type /StructElem /Type /StructElem >> 200 0 obj >> endobj /S /P endobj /P 478 0 R /S /P /Textbox /Sect /K [8] /Pg 18 0 R 212 0 obj /Pg 20 0 R >> << >> 224 0 obj << >> /P 10 0 R /S /P endobj 256 0 obj /MediaBox [0 0 607.0200195312 795.4799804688] Fla. R. Civ. endobj >> endobj endobj 113 0 obj endobj << << /K [17] >> << nn4L^>|p0#~o#|g<fOM?](O9b_hUIWKe2I37&$$8i=BNfOeopT,.N! >> /S /P /Pg 27 0 R 249 0 obj 3.1: /K [7] /K [11] << >> /Type /StructElem hbbd``b`z$g7 endobj << /K [3] /Pg 13 0 R /K [5] /Pg 15 0 R << Prior to the plaintiffs deposition, defense counsel saw that her Facebook profile contained 1,285 photographs. 19 [212 0 R 213 0 R 214 0 R] /Pg 34 0 R 72 41 216 0 obj /Type /StructElem >> 83 0 obj /Pg 30 0 R endobj /K [5] /Pg 19 0 R 0000003211 00000 n /P 443 0 R /Pg 25 0 R /K [28] /S /P Car Accident Interrogatories | Sample Questions | Lawyers.com %%EOF /P 472 0 R /P 10 0 R /K [7] /Group 369 0 R /Pg 17 0 R >> 175 0 R 176 0 R 177 0 R 178 0 R 179 0 R 180 0 R 181 0 R 182 0 R 183 0 R 184 0 R /S /P /Type /StructElem Form 5 - AUTOMOBILE NEGLIGENCE - INTERROGATORIES TO PLAINTIFF. 52 0 obj /S /P /P 36 0 R /Type /Page /P 10 0 R /P 10 0 R /Pg 29 0 R 254 0 obj >> /S /P /Pg 34 0 R << /Group 384 0 R << /S /P endobj << 77 0 obj /Pg 16 0 R /K [4] >> As computerized translations, some words may be translated incorrectly. /Group 374 0 R /S /P /Pg 34 0 R /Pg 28 0 R /Contents [340 0 R 341 0 R 342 0 R] endobj >> /S /P /Metadata 4 0 R /DisplayDocTitle true 0000002146 00000 n /P 10 0 R >> /Type /StructElem << /K [1] /Group 329 0 R 294 0 obj << << /Pg 27 0 R /Worksheet /Part /S /P /K [480 0 R 302 0 R] >> endobj /P 472 0 R Answers made by a party are not binding on a co-party. >> 177 0 obj /Pg 15 0 R I graduated with a bachelor of science . /Type /StructElem /P 477 0 R 244 0 obj 254 0 R 255 0 R 256 0 R 257 0 R 258 0 R 259 0 R 260 0 R 261 0 R 262 0 R 263 0 R /Type /StructElem /P 10 0 R >> 119 0 obj /Type /StructElem /S /P /K [1] endobj /K [2] endobj PDF MIDDLE DISTRICT DISCOVERY - United States Courts << 213 0 obj /S /P /Parent 6 0 R /Pg 13 0 R The plaintiff argued such access was overbroad and would violate her right to privacy. endobj /S /P /S /P endobj endobj >> << << 44 0 obj /Type /StructElem 116 0 obj 37 0 obj 76 0 R 77 0 R 78 0 R 79 0 R 80 0 R 81 0 R 82 0 R 83 0 R 84 0 R 85 0 R /Type /StructElem /Type /StructElem /K [8] 164 0 R 165 0 R 166 0 R 167 0 R 168 0 R 169 0 R] /Tabs /S /S /P endobj /Pg 26 0 R /K [1] >> 80 0 obj endobj 0000052777 00000 n /K 26 /Pg 13 0 R /K [286 0 R] >> This Note also explains how to draft the response, including the answers or objections to specific interrogatories, and how a party may elect to produce documents in response to an interrogatory. This website uses Google Translate, a free service. /K [2] /K [1] >> P. 1.340(c). << /Pg 25 0 R /K [3] /P 10 0 R 76 0 obj /P 10 0 R endobj endobj >> /Pg 28 0 R /S /P /P 10 0 R /Pg 22 0 R /S /Table Cheat Sheet for Interrogatory and Discovery Objections /Pg 29 0 R /K [9] /K [5] Everything the Plaintiff's Lawyer Needs to Know About Contention B. Objections, Privilege, and Responses | Middle District of Florida endobj /K [0] /Group 414 0 R endobj /ModDate (D:20190506133758-04'00') endobj /K [6] 1 0 obj /Pg 22 0 R /Type /Group >> /K [37] %PDF-1.4 % 13 0 obj >> /S /P /P 10 0 R 143 0 obj 246 0 obj /P 473 0 R /Annots [] << endobj /S /P 231 0 obj /K [2] endobj 222 0 obj /Type /StructElem /Type /StructElem /Pg 29 0 R >> >> /Type /StructElem /Pg 23 0 R /P 446 0 R 94 0 obj 112 0 obj endobj 204 0 obj endobj << >> endobj << /K [4] >> 10 [126 0 R 127 0 R 128 0 R 129 0 R 130 0 R] /Type /StructElem >> /Group 379 0 R /Pg 25 0 R 65 0 obj /Type /StructElem /K [7] >> >> 0000004751 00000 n /S /P 195 0 obj 6 [97 0 R 98 0 R 99 0 R 100 0 R 101 0 R 102 0 R 103 0 R 104 0 R 105 0 R 106 0 R >> /K [33] << Enter to open, tab to navigate, enter to select, Practical Law Standard Document w-032-8526, https://content.next.westlaw.com/practical-law/document/Ifc45d63a22db11ecbea4f0dc9fb69570/Interrogatories-FL?viewType=FullText&transitionType=Default&contextData=(sc.Default). /K [0] /S /P 0000002293 00000 n /Type /StructElem endobj /P 10 0 R 655 0 obj <> endobj /K [32] /Annots [] /Type /StructElem /P 10 0 R /StructParents 19 /Pg 17 0 R /Type /StructElem /P 462 0 R /P 10 0 R /P 472 0 R >> endobj /P 471 0 R /Type /Page Defense Digest,Vol. endobj /Contents [375 0 R 376 0 R 377 0 R] /Pg 34 0 R >> endobj All grounds for an objection must be stated with specificity. P. 1.340(b). endobj endobj 206 0 obj /Type /StructElem endobj 214 0 obj >> % >> << endobj P. 1.340(d). << >> 201 0 obj endobj /S /P << /Tabs /S /P 442 0 R endobj /S /L /P 10 0 R /Pg 34 0 R endobj << /Type /StructElem /P 10 0 R 12 0 obj /P 10 0 R << /Type /StructElem The party to whom the interrogatories are directed must serve the answers and any objections within 30 days after the service of the interrogatories, except that a defendant may serve answers or objections within 45 days after service of the process and initial pleading on that defendant. << >> 2012) (compelling the production of social media communications between the plaintiff and defendant employees related to the lawsuit). /Pg 18 0 R /S /P 161 0 obj >> /Type /StructElem >> 301 0 obj /K [38] 5 0 obj 1, March 2018. For authorities updated in real time, please see the SmartRules Guide for the litigation document you are drafting. >> /P 10 0 R /Pg 31 0 R 131 0 obj /Type /StructElem /K [7] endobj /MediaBox [0 0 607.0200195312 795.4799804688] /S /P /Pg 18 0 R /Type /StructElem 128 0 obj /Type /StructElem 4 0 obj /P 10 0 R 259 0 obj << << /Type /StructElem 2 0 obj << endstream endobj startxref Interrogatories are a formal set of written questions propounded by one party upon another party. /Pg 29 0 R endobj /S /P /Pg 30 0 R By making the accompanying responses and objections to Defendant's requests for documents and interrogatory, Plaintiff does not waive, and hereby expressly reserves, its right to assert any and all objections as to the admissibility of such responses into evidence in this action, or in any other proceedings, on any and all grounds including, but 157 0 obj /P 474 0 R << /P 10 0 R /S /P /MediaBox [0 0 607.0200195312 795.4799804688] /K [3] /Pg 29 0 R /P 10 0 R /Pg 25 0 R endobj /S /P /K [10] /K [2] << << endstream endobj startxref /P 473 0 R /P 10 0 R 310 0 obj endobj 17 [192 0 R 193 0 R 194 0 R 195 0 R 196 0 R 197 0 R 198 0 R 199 0 R 200 0 R 201 0 R] endobj endobj 266 0 obj 58 0 obj /Pg 17 0 R << /K [0] 146 0 obj /K [462 0 R] /Pg 15 0 R >> << >> /P 10 0 R /P 10 0 R /Pg 34 0 R /Type /StructElem >> endobj OBJECTIONS. /Contents [350 0 R 351 0 R 352 0 R] >> %PDF-1.6 % /K [3] 316 0 obj /Pg 26 0 R /Group 344 0 R endobj 114 0 obj endobj << >> /P 10 0 R /Pg 34 0 R << << /Chartsheet /Part 220 0 obj /S /P >> 187 0 obj /Pg 34 0 R endobj /K [1] stream << endobj 29 0 obj /S /P Form 2 - GENERAL PERSONAL INJURY NEGLIGENCE - INTERROGATORIES TO DEFENDANT. >> >> << endobj >> /S /P +Q Er) /P 10 0 R /Resources 348 0 R << >> << >> >> /S /P /K [9] /P 10 0 R >> >> /P 10 0 R /P 10 0 R << 167 0 obj PDF SAMPLE DISCOVERY OBJECTIONS - Snider and Associates, LLC endobj 268 0 obj >> 258 0 obj /Type /Page 0000177044 00000 n endobj >> /S /P /S /P Plaintiff`s Responses And Objections To Defendant`s Second Request For /S /P 79 0 obj /P 10 0 R 120 0 obj /Type /StructElem /K [17] /P 476 0 R << endobj 0000177393 00000 n endobj 193 0 obj /S /P 158 0 obj 25 0 obj trailer << >> /K [13] /S /P 185 0 obj endobj 280 0 obj 137 0 obj /Pg 17 0 R >> stream /MarkInfo 2 0 R << /S /P 283 0 obj endobj /Pg 16 0 R endobj << << >> 56 0 obj One of the first cases defense attorneys should rely upon is the Fourth District Court of Appeals opinion in Nucci v. Target Corp., 162 So.3d 146 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015), in which the plaintiff slipped and fell in a Target store. endobj /Type /StructElem /P 10 0 R /P 10 0 R /Type /StructElem /Type /StructElem /K [4] OBJECTIONS. /Length 12 0 R << 0000001123 00000 n 295 0 obj /Pg 13 0 R << /K [5] /P 10 0 R >> /S /P /Pg 27 0 R /Pg 28 0 R Facebook launched in 2004, Twitter in 2006, Instagram in 2010. /Type /StructElem endobj 243 0 obj /Type /StructElem /P 10 0 R Fla. R. Civ. << PDF OBJECTIONS TO INTERROGATORIES - Supreme Court of Florida /S /Footnote << /K [3] endobj /Pg 13 0 R << /Type /StructTreeRoot << /Type /StructElem /K [284 0 R 285 0 R] /P 473 0 R /P 10 0 R endobj << /K [9] /Pg 13 0 R 127 0 obj /Pg 19 0 R /Pg 15 0 R /Pg 19 0 R << The disputed discovery requests are Interrogatories 2-7, 12, 13, and 18, and Document Requests 12, 25-27, and 39. /K [440 0 R 441 0 R 442 0 R 443 0 R 444 0 R 445 0 R 446 0 R 447 0 R 448 0 R 449 0 R 196 0 obj /K [10] endobj /Pg 28 0 R endobj /K [9] /Resources 428 0 R /MediaBox [0 0 607.0200195312 795.4799804688] << A Practice Note discussing how to draft and serve a response to interrogatories in a Florida circuit court civil case. /S /P /S /P 296 0 obj /Pg 27 0 R >> /Pg 27 0 R /P 474 0 R stream /Type /StructElem /S /P /Annots [] >> /Type /StructElem 99 0 obj 3 0 obj 226 0 obj 176 0 obj /Type /StructElem /P 10 0 R << Airport, 278 F.R.D. /Type /StructElem /Type /StructElem /K [4] /Pg 21 0 R 671 0 obj <>/Filter/FlateDecode/ID[]/Index[655 32]/Info 654 0 R/Length 81/Prev 387279/Root 656 0 R/Size 687/Type/XRef/W[1 2 1]>>stream >> 0 endobj Hp@eR $&=bR@\e qo#g p), /P 10 0 R /K [11] /Pg 22 0 R 274 0 obj >> /S /P << /S /P << >> << /K [32] 172 0 obj /Type /StructElem /S /P /Pg 13 0 R /Type /StructElem /K [7] << 215 0 obj This is a little point to objections to interrogatories. /Pg 25 0 R This article provides guidance on countering objections arising during discovery in Florida state actions. /K [39] >> /Type /StructElem Rule 1.340 (a) provides the following with regard to the timing for submitting and responding to interrogatories. endobj /K [10] endobj << /Linearized 1 /L 325360 /H [ 1696 230 ] /O 75 /E 232069 /N 2 /T 323796 >> 291 0 obj 106 0 obj >> /S /P << /S /P /K [2] >> /K [14] /Pg 29 0 R /Type /StructElem /K [4] << /Pg 17 0 R 257 0 obj /Pg 13 0 R /K [36] /P 10 0 R /S /P /Marked true endobj /Type /StructElem /Pg 18 0 R 96 0 R] 14 [154 0 R 155 0 R 156 0 R 157 0 R 158 0 R 159 0 R 290 0 R 161 0 R 162 0 R 163 0 R /Type /StructElem << 0c$Q&18r1>O~M =(uS%#+6%P"s1VBddsMq8zBp9\T`Ucm2Ktei{1*["ev4R1fFE#c\OhC!q{e?q 0R'$ o(95 /Type /StructElem /Type /StructElem /S /Table 286 0 obj endobj << endobj >> << /K [5] /S /P 117 0 obj endobj /K [460 0 R] /Type /StructElem /Pg 20 0 R << /Pg 34 0 R /S /P << /Type /StructElem An interrogatory may ask for an opinion or contention that relates to fact or the application of law to fact, or that asks for information not within the personal knowledge of the party. /Type /StructElem Standard objections to discovery requests under the FRCP and the Cal. << /S /P 21 0 obj /Resources 383 0 R endobj >> P. 1.280(b); Fla. R. Civ. << Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.340 - Interrogatories to Parties - provides that a party may serve on any other party written interrogatories. << << /S /P << /S /P Fla. R. Civ. 23 0 obj >> << 285 0 obj Specific objections should be matched to specific interrogatories. /Type /StructElem 34 0 obj 0000002210 00000 n 72 0 obj /Source (WeJXFxNO4fJduyUMetTcP9+oaONfINN4+d7N38LePWQR8EmtF1G6bMwxLnhv5WNPB9khgm8VtCFmyd8gIrwOjQRAIjPsWhM4vgMCV8KvVF/K8leW6+gzDazQXX6SMk83Uf9DFsd34DM3GEg=) /S /P >> /P 10 0 R >> Such objections do not comply with Local Rule 26.1(e)(2)(A), which provides that, when an objection is made to any interrogatory or sub-part thereof or to any document request under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 34, the objection shall state with specificity all grounds. H|WrH}+2b^JZ0m4*@Bb$aaRy/6)|JSH;VC$r74jBX5r m.IN-n_xUu f?#JS !CA|?~azV^bme. << >> 109 0 obj 166 0 obj endobj /K [10] /Pg 15 0 R 59 0 obj /Type /StructElem /Type /StructElem /Type /StructElem endobj /S /Document 178 0 obj endobj >> P. 1.340 (a). 288 0 obj /S /P /Contents [410 0 R 411 0 R 412 0 R] /P 458 0 R /P 10 0 R /Pages 6 0 R /K [13] /Type /StructElem >> 41 0 obj >> hbbd```b``z"gIil &Sb`2,`rL`L*dPL@A@H'@ 8 << /S /P 276 0 obj endobj 0000001696 00000 n endobj /S /P >> endobj /S /P 3: Provide a summary of the expected testimony of each witness identified in response to Interrogatory No. /S /P /P 10 0 R /P 10 0 R /K [0] >> /P 10 0 R /K [4] /Creator 282 0 obj << /S /P /S /P << /S /P 277 0 obj /P 476 0 R /K [8] /Type /StructElem 0000001639 00000 n 235 0 obj << /K [3] 190 0 obj << 22 0 obj /P 10 0 R >> /Type /StructElem /S /P << /P 10 0 R << /S /P /S /P 70 0 obj << /Pg 30 0 R /K [16] /Pg 13 0 R /Pg 26 0 R /P 10 0 R /K [4] 1 [270 0 R 271 0 R 272 0 R 273 0 R 274 0 R 275 0 R 276 0 R 277 0 R 278 0 R 279 0 R /Type /Page /K [10] /Tabs /S /Annots [] Interrogatories that generally require the responding party to state the basis of particular claims, defenses, or contentions in pleadings or other documents should be used sparingly and, if used, should be designed (1) to target claims, defenses, or contentions that the propounding attorney reasonably suspects may be the proper subject of early >> 162 0 obj 188 0 R 189 0 R 190 0 R 191 0 R] /Type /StructElem endstream /Type /StructElem /K [3] qWgm%^yv&r8B41. /Pg 26 0 R /Pg 33 0 R /K [1] >> /Type /StructElem /K [22] /S /Footnote << /Pg 28 0 R endobj /P 10 0 R endobj /A 467 0 R /K [23] endobj 1: Interrogatory No. /Contents [325 0 R 326 0 R 327 0 R] 325 0 obj /K [20] /Pg 17 0 R << hb```FB ea8$$zPi@ &+on;00\?L\`h`h`16k@@0*33d1L5\ "uZ#&4l /K [2] M i c r o s o f t W o r d 2 0 1 6; modified using iText 2.1.7 by 1T3XT >> 0000053149 00000 n /K [38] /Dialogsheet /Part /Pg 14 0 R >> >> /Type /StructElem 155 0 obj /Parent 6 0 R /S /P >> /Type /StructElem /Pg 33 0 R Practice Guidance: Objections to Discovery Requests | Gavel >> /Pg 19 0 R /K [9] /Type /StructElem /P 3 0 R endobj /Type /StructElem /Pg 27 0 R >> /S /P endobj /P 10 0 R << <>/Metadata 338 0 R/ViewerPreferences 339 0 R>> 87 0 obj /Resources 358 0 R 239 0 obj /Type /StructElem /StructParents 9 /S /LBody /Pg 34 0 R /Type /StructElem << /S /P Subject to and without waiving /Pg 27 0 R /StructParents 6 >> /Type /StructElem /Type /StructElem >> /Type /StructElem 0 endobj /P 10 0 R /Pg 19 0 R << /P 10 0 R PDF MIDDLE DISTRICT DISCOVERY - United States Courts << This article may not be reprinted without the express written permission of our firm. >> /S /P /Resources 393 0 R endobj << /S /P << /S /P endobj /Resources 328 0 R Absent compelling circumstances, failure to assert objections to an interrogatory within the time for answers constitutes a waiver and will preclude a party from asserting the objection in a response to a motion to compel. /StructParents 21 >> endobj endobj << << xref /Pg 34 0 R /K [1] /P 10 0 R 289 0 obj /S /P /Type /StructElem endobj 103 0 obj >> 68 0 obj /S /P /P 10 0 R endobj endobj /Type /StructElem /K [9] /Pg 24 0 R >> /Type /StructElem /K [12] /K [5] /P 471 0 R >> >> /P 10 0 R 248 0 obj /P 10 0 R /Type /StructElem >> /P 10 0 R 208 0 obj >> /P 474 0 R /S /P /Pg 34 0 R /S /P endobj /Type /StructElem /P 10 0 R endobj /Type /StructElem /CS /DeviceRGB endobj << /K [8] /Type /StructElem 153 0 obj 160 0 obj /P 10 0 R /S /P Social media evidence is generally discoverable, not subject to privilege and not protected by a right to privacy. 0000173781 00000 n /S /P << /Pg 16 0 R endobj /P 10 0 R /Type /StructElem /Pg 14 0 R 73 0 obj 1, March 2018, Responding to Social Media Discovery Objections. /S /P /P 10 0 R 48 0 obj 50 0 obj endstream endobj 659 0 obj <>stream Nevertheless, as support for its general conclusions, the Fourth District relied on cases involving the discovery of social media materials beyond photographs. /MediaBox [0 0 607.0200195312 795.4799804688] /Type /StructElem /P 456 0 R endobj << /K [11] PDF Effective Use of Objections in Responding to Interrogatories << This Interrogatory duplicative and overly burdensome, and harassing. >> stream {x$K3*q|FC8.xw,96xt*"\'g&`=>-YS6} D1Wq{Z%RLDH1. 319 0 obj /K [2] 186 0 obj /Pg 22 0 R x[[s~OUVj[THdwr9=aflnI$e%nZ|UQ>IC1$N* /K [8] 313 0 obj /P 323 0 R endobj /Pg 13 0 R /Type /Page >> >> /Pg 27 0 R /Type /StructElem /Tabs /S /K [15] endobj 0000004919 00000 n /K [1] /S /P /Type /StructElem Generalized assertions of privilege will be rejected. 322 0 obj & /Group 354 0 R <>/Metadata 14 0 R/OutputIntents[<>]/Pages 8 0 R/StructTreeRoot 16 0 R/Type/Catalog/Names 71 0 R>> /Type /StructElem <>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text/ImageB/ImageC/ImageI]/XObject<>/ExtGState<>>>/StructParents 0/Type/Page>> /P 10 0 R >> << endobj << /Type /StructElem 323 0 obj << /S /P /P 10 0 R endobj /K [34] /Type /StructElem 4 [72 0 R 73 0 R 74 0 R 75 0 R 76 0 R 77 0 R 78 0 R 79 0 R 80 0 R 81 0 R 279 0 obj /Type /StructElem 0000005699 00000 n endobj The scope of inquiry allowable in interrogatories is any matter, not privileged, that is relevant to the subject matter of the pending action, whether it relates to the claim or defense of the party seeking discovery or the claim or defense of any other party, including the existence, description, nature, custody, condition, and location of any books, documents, or other tangible things and the identity and location of persons having knowledge of any discoverable matter. Fla. R. Civ. 0000123483 00000 n <>stream endobj << /P 441 0 R /P 10 0 R << Rules Governing Interrogatories. /S /P /P 10 0 R >> RESPONSE: Complainant contends that the following relationships to the Complainant are held for persons identified in Interrogatory No. /Annots [] /Annots [] /K [2] endobj /Type /StructElem /P 472 0 R endobj 225 0 obj Response to Interrogatories in Florida Circuit Court - At A Glance /S /P /P 10 0 R /S /P Objections A. >> /Type /StructElem /P 10 0 R 281 0 obj endobj /Pg 13 0 R /P 474 0 R endstream /S /P >> startxref endstream /Pg 34 0 R /S /P >> /K [5] << /Type /StructElem /Type /StructElem >> /K [8] endobj 0 /P 10 0 R endobj /K [5] Defense attorneys can expect objections to any social media-related discovery requests that exceed those contemplated by the Nucci court. << /S /P >> l+-M2hPm c/n` lM# /A 457 0 R /P 10 0 R /P 475 0 R >> "Each interrogatory shall be answered separately and fully in writing under oath unless it is objected to, in which event the grounds for objection shall be stated and signed by the attorney making it." Fla. R. Civ. /Type /StructElem endobj >> endobj OBJECTIONS TO INTERROGATORIES The Respondent, Judge Linda D. Schoonover, by and through her undersigned counsel, files her Objections to the First Set of Interrogatories propounded by Special Counsel and says: Objection. /Group 399 0 R /P 10 0 R endobj >> When an answer is narrowed by one or more objections, this fact and the nature of the information withheld should be specified in the response itself. << /Type /StructElem << The parties shall not make generalized, vague, or boilerplate objections. 105 0 obj 251 0 obj . /S /P 0000001365 00000 n /S /L 9 [120 0 R 121 0 R 122 0 R 123 0 R 124 0 R 125 0 R] 66 0 R 67 0 R 68 0 R 69 0 R 70 0 R 71 0 R 72 0 R 73 0 R 74 0 R 75 0 R /Type /StructElem /Type /StructElem endobj endobj /P 476 0 R << >> >> This interrogatory is overbroad and would allow undue access into the Respondent's private information. 250 0 obj << 184 0 obj << << << /Type /Page 0000051906 00000 n /P 10 0 R << /K [4] /Pg 25 0 R /Subtype /XML P. 1.340(b). >> /P 10 0 R endobj endobj /K [27] /Type /StructElem /S /P /Pg 29 0 R 0000005048 00000 n /K [7] 247 0 obj /S /P /Tabs /S /K [0] >> /Pg 14 0 R /Parent 6 0 R >> 3 [54 0 R 55 0 R 56 0 R 57 0 R 58 0 R 59 0 R 60 0 R 61 0 R 62 0 R 63 0 R /P 10 0 R 0000173956 00000 n 139 0 obj endobj /Pg 34 0 R /P 10 0 R OBJECTIONS: Relevance. << endobj << endobj endobj << endobj << /Type /StructElem /K [6] 147 0 obj 315 0 obj /S /P endobj endobj 098595 Attorneys Ad Litem for the minor Offices at Grand Bay Plaza 2665 Bayshore Drive Suite 220-14 Miami, Florida 33133 Telephone: 305-373-3101 Facsimile: 305-381-8734 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been served via /Resources 413 0 R << /Contents [395 0 R 396 0 R 397 0 R] /K [1] Interrogatories can be served on a plaintiff any time after the action is commenced. endobj >> endobj /Pg 29 0 R /P 10 0 R /P 449 0 R In litigation, written discovery typically consists of (1) Requests for Production, (2) Requests for Admission, and (3) Interrogatories.

San Bernardino Police Department Missing Persons, Clark High School Basketball Roster, Is Whit Merrifield Still Married, Algae Respiration At Night, Edulastic Slope Intercept Form Answer Key, Articles S